You may have heard Tasmania Police have withdrawn their reclassification guidelines.
While that is good news, this episode reaffirms the problem that our police forces do a pretty bad job when it comes to consultation. Read more »
Author Archives: Secretary, CFCV - Page 32
Why consultation by our police forces remains an issue
Posted by Secretary, CFCV
on August 12, 2016
1 comment
Why the NSW greyhound ban is bad news for hunters
Posted by Secretary, CFCV
on August 11, 2016
3 comments
The animal liberationists are on the warpath, and what happened to the greyhound industry in NSW was one of the swiftest political executions we’ve seen in a long time.
Oh – did I neglect to say hunting could be next? Read more »
How buying beer and doughnuts will make your life better
Posted by Secretary, CFCV
on August 8, 2016
No comments
Who doesn’t love Homer Simpson? He brought beer and doughnuts back to life.
Reeeaaallyyy.
If you’re about to jump in your car to get your beer and doughnuts – along with your milk, bread, biscuits and carrots – then head to a Ritchies IGA with your Community Benefits card made out to the CFCV.
Part of what you spend will then be donated to the CFCV.
Imagine that – buying your every day items from the supermarket directly helps protect the shooting sports!
Order your Community Benefits card by clicking here now!
(Click here to find out where your nearest Ritchies IGA is)
Federal Senate results – good or bad for us?
Posted by Secretary, CFCV
on August 4, 2016
7 comments
The results are in. The new Senate comprises the following number of senators:
From a shooting perspective it would be fair to say the Greens, Hinch and possibly Xenophon are anti-firearm. Those likely to be for include One Nation, LDP, Family First (Bob Day) and maybe Jacquie Lambie.
If we include the maybes, that would be 13 anti, and 7 for.
As the government would need 9 votes to get a majority (30+9=39, to get more than 50% of 76), any vote important enough to reach the senate could go either way.
Given the Greens would be likely to always vote against what we do, we suspect the overall result would not be good for us; but possibly better than the last Senate we had.
Recent Comments